2010/10.29
11.06
接續上週關於課室中互動分析的討論,我們瞭解了教室中的互動是充滿意義的,即使是一個簡單的字詞(one simple word)也代表了豐富的意涵。我們接著進行了影片分析,影片內容是九月初在台北縣烏來種籽小學所拍攝的一堂英文課,班上人數為11人,全部都是五年級的學生。
藉由影片片段以及逐字稿,我們漸漸清晰學生與教師互動的脈絡,而教授也提供給我們他初步分析的狀況:
Prof. Dr. Rainer Kokemohr Workshop ‘Classroom Interaction Analysis’
Parents Institution / Government
(labor market) (curriculum / labor market)
<––––– Power (to be performed) –––––>
authority (linked to the performance of power):
a) professional knowledge
b) professional faculty of leading teaching-learning-discourses
c) convincing personality, convincing lifestyle
experimental / “free” School: <–––––//–––––> “regular” School:
offering ‘freedom’ to pupils obliging pupils to follow the
(caused by social transformation rules (linked to conventional
social modernization) organization and established
system of power performance)
<––––––––––– a “dialectical” process ––––––––––>
As every social interaction is also a performance of power
teachers and students can’t escape from the performance of power:
“balancing” between both sides in view of productive teaching and learning.
(Does the metaphor “balancing” meet the issue?)
Categories and aspects of the analysis of classroom interaction
(according to Saxe et al.: A methodology. framework…, text 1):
a) ontogenetic processes: (maybe in line 102 Michael’s counting of seven “0”
indicates the beginning of a learning process)
b) microgenetic processes: “…will you still come in today”;
“Mr. Wong, Wei-Hong”;
smile and other behavior…
c) sociogenetic processes: gender-construction: girls and boys seated in different
lines; turn-giving / turn-taking…
接著,則由我們繼續著手進行分析...
沒有留言:
張貼留言